Lesson ProgressPhase 5 of 6
Phase 5Assessment
Assessment: Project Rehearsal: Guided Practice with Shared Data

Check that students understand the project standard and can evaluate it in another student's work

Phase 5: Transfer Check and Peer Audit
Transfer Check: Do You Understand the Project Standard?

Answer these questions to confirm you understand what a complete project workbook looks like and how to evaluate one.

Project Standard Transfer Check
Verify your understanding of the Definition of Done, evidence chains, and peer audit criteria

1. Why does every group use the same data during rehearsal but different data in the real project?

2. A recommendation says 'TechStart should cut marketing spend.' The only evidence cited is 'net income is low.' What is missing?

3. Which of the following is NOT a required element of every project workbook?

4. During a peer audit, you find that a group's recommendation cites a number from the Adjustments sheet, but that number does not appear on the Financial Statements sheet. What should your feedback say?

5. What is the most important thing your team must carry from today's rehearsal into the real project?

6. A peer's workbook has all seven required sheets, but the Risk statement says 'There may be some risks we did not consider.' How should you rate this?

0 of 6 questions answered
Peer Audit Routine

Exchange your recommendation statement (from Phase 4) with another group. Use the criteria below to evaluate their work. For each criterion, identify one clear strength and one clear improvement.

Evidence Chain

Does every claim on the Recommendation sheet cite specific numbers from another sheet?

Strength looks like:

Claims are backed by exact figures I can verify on the source sheet

Improvement needed when:

Claims reference vague concepts like 'low revenue' without citing numbers

Logic Chain

Do the numbers on the Recommendation sheet match the numbers on the Financial Statements sheet?

Strength looks like:

All cited numbers match their source sheets exactly

Improvement needed when:

Numbers on the Recommendation sheet do not match the Financial Statements sheet

Risk Statement

Is the risk statement specific and tied to the data, or is it a generic disclaimer?

Strength looks like:

Names a specific uncertainty with measurable impact (e.g., 'If client X delays payment, cash drops below 4 weeks')

Improvement needed when:

Uses vague language like 'there may be risks we did not consider'

Auditability

Does the Assumptions sheet include date, version, and data source?

Strength looks like:

Assumptions sheet is complete and clearly labeled

Improvement needed when:

Assumptions sheet is missing, has no date, or does not name the data source

Clarity

Could someone who did not build this workbook understand the recommendation in under 30 seconds?

Strength looks like:

The recommendation is one clear sentence with evidence listed below it

Improvement needed when:

The recommendation is buried in a long paragraph with no clear claim

Submit Your Peer Audit

Use the form below to record your audit findings. Be specific — cite exact phrases or numbers from the workbook you reviewed.

Peer Critique & Feedback
Provide constructive feedback to support peer learning and professional development
Unit 2
Reviewing: Peer Group

TechStart Month-End Rehearsal Workbook

Project by Peer Group

Progress
0%
Strengths & Highlights
What did this peer do exceptionally well?
Not Rated
Select rating
0 characters
Areas for Growth
Constructive suggestions for enhancement
Not Rated
Select rating
0 characters
Excel Technical Skills
Spreadsheet functionality and accuracy
Not Rated
Select rating
0 characters
Business Analysis
Strategic thinking and real-world application
Not Rated
Select rating
0 characters
Communication & Delivery
Professional presentation and clarity
Not Rated
Select rating
0 characters
Overall Summary & Additional Comments
Provide any additional feedback, suggestions, or overall impressions
0 characters
Please complete all ratings and comments before submitting