Lesson ProgressPhase 4 of 6
Phase 4Independent Practice
Independent Practice: Final Presentation, Submission, and Reflection

Review other teams' presentations using the rubric and submit feedback.

Phase 4: Audience Review

Review Other Teams and Submit Feedback

While other teams present, you are an active audience member and reviewer. Your feedback helps your classmates improve and demonstrates your own understanding of what makes a strong pricing recommendation. Use the rubric to guide your evaluations.

How to Review a Presentation

Use the rubric categories below to evaluate each team's presentation. Be specific, constructive, and fair in your feedback.

1. Technical Accuracy (50%)

  • Did the team cite accurate numbers from their workbook?
  • Were their calculations and formulas correct?
  • Did their evidence actually support their recommendation?
  • Was their sensitivity analysis thorough and meaningful?

2. Strategic Rationale (20%)

  • Does the recommendation make business sense?
  • Did they address trade-offs between profitability and competitiveness?
  • Is their risk assessment honest and realistic?
  • Did they explain why their recommendation is still the best choice?

3. Communication and Clarity (15%)

  • Was the presentation easy to follow?
  • Did they use their Dashboard and supporting sheets effectively?
  • Was their language appropriate for a stakeholder audience?
  • Were their visuals clean and professional?

4. Time Management (10%)

  • Did they stay within the 3-5 minute limit?
  • Were transitions between speakers smooth?
  • Did they cover all required sections without rushing?

5. Q&A Readiness (5%)

  • Did they answer questions confidently?
  • Did they reference their workbook when responding?
  • Were their answers specific and evidence-based?
What to Note During Each Presentation

Keep brief notes on each team. Focus on these areas:

Strengths

  • What did they do well?
  • What evidence was most convincing?
  • What part of their presentation was clearest?

Areas to Improve

  • What was confusing or unclear?
  • What evidence was weak or missing?
  • What would make their recommendation stronger?

Questions to Ask

  • What would you want to know if you were an investor?
  • What scenario did they not test that you are curious about?
  • How does their approach compare to your team's?

Key Numbers

  • What price did they recommend?
  • What profit did they project?
  • What was their biggest risk?
Submit Your Feedback

Use the form below to submit your review for each team. Be specific and constructive. Your feedback will be shared with the teams to help them improve.

Peer Critique & Feedback
Provide constructive feedback to support peer learning and professional development
Unit 6
Reviewing: Classmate

PriceLab Final Presentation Review

Project by Classmate

Progress
0%
Strengths & Highlights
What did this peer do exceptionally well?
Not Rated
Select rating
0 characters
Areas for Growth
Constructive suggestions for enhancement
Not Rated
Select rating
0 characters
Excel Technical Skills
Spreadsheet functionality and accuracy
Not Rated
Select rating
0 characters
Business Analysis
Strategic thinking and real-world application
Not Rated
Select rating
0 characters
Communication & Delivery
Professional presentation and clarity
Not Rated
Select rating
0 characters
Overall Summary & Additional Comments
Provide any additional feedback, suggestions, or overall impressions
0 characters
Please complete all ratings and comments before submitting
Compare Approaches Across Teams

As you watch multiple presentations, think about these comparison questions:

  • Which team had the strongest evidence? What made it strong?
  • Which team handled Q&A most effectively? What did they do differently?
  • Did any team's recommendation surprise you? Why?
  • How did different businesses' constraints (capacity, target profit) affect their pricing strategies?
  • What is one thing you learned from another team that you would apply to your own work?